Y-cam Cube (YCW005)
Y-cam Cube (YCW005)
Manuf (OEM/ODM): Anbash NC215
FCC approval date: 06 March 2013
(Est.) initial retail price (in USD): $199.99
Country of manuf.: China
Type: camera
FCC ID: V4FCUBE
Power: 12 VDC, 1 A
Connector type: barrel
CPU1: Grain Media GM8125
FLA1: ? MiB (Brand? Model?)
RAM1: 128 MiB134,217,728 B <br />1,048,576 Kib <br />131,072 KiB <br />1,024 Mib <br />0.125 GiB <br /> (Samsung K4T1G164QF-BCF7)
Expansion IFs: microSD
WI1 module: unknown
WI1 module IF: USB (non-standard connector)
WI1 chip1: Ralink RT3070
WI1 802dot11 protocols: bgn
WI1 MIMO config: 1x1:1
WI1 antenna connector: U.FL
ETH chip1: Grain Media GM8125
LAN speed: 100M
LAN ports: 1
bgn
Flags: schematics
Default SSID: ycam
Default IP address: 192.168.1.150
Default login user: admin
Default login password: 1234
admin:1234 credentials used by 185 additional devices
of which 0 are Y-cam devices
For a list of all currently documented Grain Media SoC's with specifications, see Grain Media.
For a list of all currently documented Ralink chipsets with specifications, see Ralink.
"ABNCMAIN1VB" is silkscreened on the SoC board.
- "ABNC215OV77251VC" (or something) is silkscreened on the camera, Ethernet, and microSD board.
- "JW801M0 Ver:1.3" is silkscreened on the wireless module. A label on the module shows an FCC ID of XONSR806000 and a model of JW-8XXMN.
- "ABNC215IRLED1VC" is silkscreened on the IR LED board.
- "ABNC215PBOX1VC" is silkscreened on the Ethernet adapter (PoE?) board. The camera does not have a standard RJ-45 jack..
- Board P/Ns clearly indicate Anbash (Shenzhen Anbash Technology) manufacture
This device is presumed to be an Anbash NC215.
This device is using a GM8125EL-QC SoC.
- K4T1G164QF-BCE7 / K4T1G164QF-BCF7 128MB RAM
Y-cam's specs state the device can handle a microSD card with capacity up to 64GB.
The manual shows the sample SSID (w/ Ad-Hoc mode) as ycam (this is presumed to be accurate...). YCW005 is noted as the White model. YCB005 is the Black model.
The FCC label shows the device with an 00:E0:4C (Ralink) OUI.. this is, again, presumed to be correct (for the wireless interface).
